RE: My taste in music is terrifyingly superior to everyone else's
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
LOL, you wish.
This is a very confident post for someone losing to three links:
The Battle of Evermore
Child in Time
Pneuma
Game over.
(Mic dropped gently, so as not to damage your argument further)
0
0
0.000
If we could quantify Greatness + Cliche, the sum total would be 0. As great as all 3 bands are - they are in my lists, just not the 10 most recent - I'm actually capable of moving forwards in time, fast enough to catch the mic without breaking my neck (like you after nodding your head slowly to Led Zeppelin)
You’re not describing music. You’re describing your attention span (with bad math).
Masterpieces survived longer than your argument will. :-)
Tempted to run some kind of script to tell me the average song length on my list, half a dozen of which are 25 minutes long, so you apologise for such a remark. Unfortunately I don't really know what running a script actually means
No script needed. Using average song length to defend taste is exactly the kind of bad math I meant. Length is not depth. By that logic, Cage already won (no, it's not on my playlist ;-) )
It was merely my defense against your accusation of my lack of attention span. If anything my attention span is insufferably long. When it comes to depth... I could have a blog-battle about that, but I suspect it might be a war of attrition.
Oh, we could test just how deep a conversation can go on Hive frontends, and whose playlist runs out first.
I’m just mildly disappointed no one else has dared to join our little flame war. ;-)
Haha yeah I need some downvotes -__-