What’s your opinion about our world challenge?
The media says our challenge is an invisible enemy.
The ones who create a scientific theory have the burden of proof. But, nobody offered a proof for the invisible enemy.
The lack of proof has a lot of implications. To reduce people’s freedom, you need proof. I don’t mean images with caskets, I mean an actual proof. This kind of images are designed to create fear, rather than to prove scientific theories. If our challenge is in the field of scientific, then the proof also has to be in the field of science.
Images with caskets look more like proofs from fearmongers rather than scientific proofs.
An unproven scientific theory looks more like a spook?
Which leads us to the question:
Where's the proof?
Beside the proof, there are a lot of other aspects that have unanswered questions.
My curiosity is to know what’s your opinion on these aspects.
What do you think they're testing?
Why are we heading toward a surveillance world that's justified through safety?
What's your opinion about central banks?
What's our actual challenge?
Don't you find it odd that all the current measures of the new normal are based on a spook? –link needed.
What’s your opinion about the media?
In 1 censorship world, How can we help people with information?
What can we do?
What’s your opinion about freedom of movement?
How did they conclude that this flu is different from every other flu?
What’s your opinion about free speech?
How sustainable is our system that only creates debt?
What’s your opinion about temperature screening?
What are we talking about?
What’s your opinion about the measures of our new normal?
What's your opinion about the economic measures?
What’s your opinion about Ventilators?
What’s your opinion about Surgical Masks?
Congratulations @askmihai! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board And compare to others on the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPSupport the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
Interesting questions; Shouldn't you ask one question per post only ? I don't know which one to answer...
i appreciate your feedback.
You can start with the first questions, such as:
Governments are trying to save lifes and to preserve the economy which are two differents objectives for the short term, but on the middle term, a better economy can save lifes too. On the long term, capitalism is destroying the ressources we need to live. Very difficult question.
Because this new disease is unknown, the actions are not always accurate. Different countries take different actions.
Testing more people and isolation positive persons and washing your hands seems to be the two most efficient actions to preserve lifes.
Without a proof,
The media are selling the news that people are buying.
People are more interested by sensational information rather than scientific facts, so the media are telling sensational information.
i agree: the media are telling sensational information, instead of proofs.
There is no proof, there is a consensus among epidemiologist of occidental medicine. For exemple, traditional chinese medicine does not recognize virus as cause of diseases. Now, if the consensus is right, taking actions could save lifes. Promoting a better health through a better nutritution, some QiCong exercices is also saving lifes. Each patient is responsible for which medicine he is choosing.
What would be a proof ? How much time would be necessary to get a proof ? What to do expecting the results of the experiments ?
Thanks for taking the time to share your opinions!
i agree:
Considering our current measures have zero proof then,
They are checking if they can find virus DNA fragments into sample from your internal fluids.
They are using RQ PCR technics to do that.
Any DNA fragments from anywhere can contaminate the sample and get false positive
If the sample is not representative of your body, you can get virus and be a false negative.
Precision of this test is very weak.
They are not testing your ability to naturally fight against CoVID-19.
i agree:
So then,
The presentation from Dc Andrew Kaufman is very interesting
thank you for the link.
What did you understand from that presentation?
“There are fundamental differences between viruses and vesicles: Viruses can replicate and vesicles cannot,” Margolis said. “But there are many variants in between. Where do viruses start, and where do extracellular vesicles start?”
https://www.quantamagazine.org/cells-talk-in-a-language-that-looks-like-viruses-20180502
In what way are your quotes answering the question?
Do you think you can write a phrase?
Do you have a proof for the invisible enemy?
"In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season" with 120,000 deaths in US today, this is not a spook.
"no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian."
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia3/ciencia_coronavirus15.htm
What's the point that you're trying to make?
This has been an urgency response, which is probably not adapted to what we know today.
Did you read the paragraph about Ventilators?
Surgical masks are made to prevent infection during surgery
So then Why are they part of the new normal?
Temperature screening allows someone to detect that your body is active against an infection.
So then why do we find this measure at the entrance of stores?
Freedom of movement is nice as long as you do not endanger someone else.
Why are they reducing our freedom of movement through social distancing?
Here in France, many people are asking for more surveillance. They think that surveillance will decrease violence. I think that a fairer redistribution of wealth and a better education would be more efficient than surveillance.
http://ventureo.solutions
Did you read the rest of the paragraph or just this question?
I like free speech, I have always been able to say what I think. I don't know what to do with people who are posting hate speech or promote pedophilia.
Did you read the rest of the paragraph or just the title?
Providing a free education and answering questions is my way to help people.
The actual question is:
Do you think you can consider the whole question?
Capitalism is destroying the planet but there is not a consensus to apply another system. We are testing many social inovations.
This Video is pretty informative.
Don't you have your own opinion?
Capitalism have improved the life level of millions of people and put into slavering millions of other ones.
Communism have killed million of people and lead to dictatureship.
We are looking for a new political and economical system but this not an easy task.
You're right. We have an epic challenge.
Don't you have an opinion about it?
What can we do about it?
We can choose being in peace
You're right: peace is our solution.
Not too many people know this, otherwise,
How can we reach people with the message?
What do you think?
Do we have to think in term of challenge ? or is it enough to know who we are ?
You're right: when we know who we are, when we function from our real self, we're beneficial for our actual purpose of evolution.
How many people know who they are?
Why do most people take massive action to build their own prison that's also our prison?
How do we reach these people with the message?
What do you think?